who knows...good luck trying to enforce the copyright note anyway...ugh
> >documents are a “WORK MADE FOR HIRE” and the OWNERSHIP OF A COPYRIGHT, IF AVAILABLE, VESTS IN THE PROFESSIONAL.
>
> Did you leave out a NOT ? I'd suggest you research the meaning of the term "Work Made for Hire", as I think your last sentence is a contradiction.
I meant to reply to you earlier, but I've been trying to locate my master documents to see if I did leave out "Not". It was 1997 or 1998 when this work order document was put together and since I'm now retired, never really use it anymore.
Contract Verbiage> Charles Dowdell
> Now that's pretty wordy. Couldn't that be reduced substansially and still say the same thing?
>
> Has there been an issue in your copany iwht unauthorized re-use of surveys?
>
> I bet an attorney charged a ton for that paragraph, do you really put it on all your survey plans? That must eat up a pretty good chunk of space..
This does not go on survey plats. This is an excerpt from my Work Order document. It is a compilation of another firms work order, writings of Jerry Broadus, Ted Madsen, and others. The original document was prepared in the mid 1980's and then modified in the mid 1990's. Since I am now retired, I no longer need to worry about using it. I posted the excerpt because it was similar to Scott Freshwaters post.