I am doing a 4 hour session on our local GPS on BM station today, using 2.000 m +.100 m with our other receivers (hiper II) to compare the results.?ÿ

I have a question into NGS asking for which model they recommend for a 2m carbon fiber rod.  No response yet.  

I was at a loss as well. Fact- 2.100 m input height using 2.000 m tripod, the .100 m adapter and the hyper_v model will produce a solution 0.052 m d...

negative. this is incorrect and will produce an error of 5 cm.

Hi from Carroll/Baltimore County.

I have access to OPUS, CarlsonGNSS and Star*Net. That's it.

I inherited a variety of issues.  I believe the Static and RTK issues are separate and will have different resolutions. When bringing RTK vector...

it would appear so, see NGS reply below.

using a 2m fixed height tripod and the .1m adapter: ANT NAME: TPSHIPER_V     NONE        ...

got a reply from NGS: ?ÿ So in theory, TPSHIPER_V+10 used with a 2.000m input height should produce the same result as TPSHIPER_V used with a 2.100m h...

I'll be there all day Monday and Tuesday morning. ?ÿ ?ÿ

keep after them if you don't see it in 10 days, mine took 4 phone calls and 45 days...

Owings Mills.gsf N37?ø25'59.0" W078?ø45'00.0" N41?ø23'59.0" W074?ø46'59.0" custom file created by our Carlson rep ?ÿ

Here is shows 2.1000 and a phase center correction of 0.0925:BP,PNBP001,LA39.245469902207,LN-76.465103374896,EL111.7164,AG2.1000,PA0.0925,ATAPC,SRBASE...

Posted by: Loyal It is applying the ARP to L1 Phase Center values to the HI & Rod Values (as it should). The Vectors are L1 Phase Center to L1 Pha...

shouldn't the end of the G1 line read 2.100/2.000 instead of 2.212/2.092 ?

Here is the StarNet GPS file: Where is it getting these bogus heights? ?ÿ .GPS WEIGHT COVARIANCE G0 'V1 2017/12/21 14:03:49,(Average) - Base ID read a...