AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all
shawn-billings
shawn-billings
@shawn-billings
Free
Joined: May 29, 2012 9:14 am
Last seen: July 23, 2026 8:33 am
Topics: 93 / Replies: 2598
Reply
RE: DC 50

Just sent it. Let me know if you didn't get it.

12 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Carlson Field to Finish Vertical Bust?

It could be the issue has always been there but is really only apparent with the heavily lopsided POC in Edward's example. Perhaps the extrapolation c...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: DC 50

The printed manual was out of date to the final software release. Might be good to hunt down the last pdf of manual. I probably have it somewhere if S...

12 years ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Carlson Field to Finish Vertical Bust?

I think Plumb Bill is right. Look for an interpolate/extrapolate option.

12 years ago
Reply
RE: Yolo Base Line 1881

I like your thinking Jerry.

12 years ago
Reply
RE: Yolo Base Line 1881

So cool. Those precise baseline measurements from that era are always so fascinating to me. Retracing one sounds fantastic. Be sure to watch for the s...

12 years ago
Reply
Reply
RE: Relative Positional Precision - Why did I fail?

Just out of curiosity, can you run the relative inverse test at 68% and cut the allowable tolerance in half 1cm + 25ppm?I wouldn't take these results ...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: Relative Positional Precision - Why did I fail?

95% error estimates are basically twice the standard error estimates (68%). I think Surv Net is boogering the 95% calculation. For instance you have a...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

> It is possible to continue to add a never ending inflationary spiral of conditions and qualifiers for a test, such that open ended criteria will ...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

> If RTK takes multiple occupations to generate a reliable answer at some realistically estimated uncertaintyThat's a big "IF" that might just prov...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

> But first, how did you deal with distance-dependent uncertainies perform the same test at various ranges from the base. Although in Don's case, h...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

If you are interested how the receiver will perform next to a building or under a tree, you can perform this same test in those environments as well.

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

I generally do make two shots on anything that is critical, although that isn't always practical. I seldom find that shot one doesn't agree nicely wit...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

Don,If you have a controller that can do this, this is my basic test for RTK precision, and I'd highly recommend you do this not only to test your rov...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

ok. It seems safe to say that you are really only interested in deriding a technology, mostly due to the warped notion that because some abuse the tec...

12 years ago
Reply
RE: RTK and integrated surveying technology

> Were these vectors from a test? I saw your post, but what has been under discussion has been a semi-rigorous test of the processor-estimated unce...

12 years ago
Page 88 / 135