AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
roger_LS
roger_LS
@roger_ls
Member
Joined: April 9, 2016 1:00 pm
Topics: 11 / Replies: 434
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415095, member: 3 wrote: there are cases where a private surveyor did work in the interim between the centerline survey and the r...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415081, member: 3 wrote: They would not be monuments that the parties had in view at the time of the original conveyance and so w...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415071, member: 3 wrote: My observations mostly are not assumptions. It's a fact that the right-of-way deeds typically make no re...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415067, member: 3 wrote: Yes, that's ordinarily a safe assumption because (a) the deeds typically make no reference to any line h...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415063, member: 3 wrote: Well, when the boundary is defined in relation to a certain line that was actually surveyed, then not ac...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415044, member: 3 wrote: I guess I just don't see that as being some indeterminate problem to reconstruct a state highway centerl...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

Kent McMillan, post: 415029, member: 3 wrote: Well, it seems to me to be a straightforward surveying problem. The right-of-way markers were set in rel...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

If original monumentation has disappeared, how would you even re-establish this centerline without relying on secondary evidence? And if secondary evi...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

I'm coming in late to this conversation and there may be much I've missed, but is there something special about retracing State ROW's? Are these any d...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

I had involvement in a job a while ago where my client had a case that had gone to the State Supreme Court over an easement that he was ultimately awa...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

MightyMoe, post: 414381, member: 700 wrote: Title insurance only kicks in if there was a policy issued. And someone with standing has to make the clai...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

Tom Adams, post: 414267, member: 7285 wrote: The Title Company's obligation is to insure title. They will do enough title work they deem necessary to...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

Like many things surveying, this boils down to an individuals comfort level. I can respect the many who feel just fine moving forward as is. Personall...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

thebionicman, post: 414190, member: 8136 wrote: The issue has been correctly identified as a title (records) problem. What hasn't been said is that we...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

In my opinion, this is a Title Problem not a survey location problem. If they are looking for an absolute determination of ownership, I would get the ...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary opinion

Tom Adams, post: 413301, member: 7285 wrote: No need to get your HACKels up. It's just a thread on discussing boundary on a surveyor's site. A littl...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary opinion

Brian Allen, post: 413268, member: 1333 wrote: A sign hangs on the wall above my computer screen, just to help me break old bad habits that were taugh...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Lucus is letting 50% of us have it in POB this month!

Scott Ellis, post: 413103, member: 7154 wrote: After reading some of the questions posted on here about needing help to solve a boundary issues, I wou...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: ALTA Survey Utilities

With these ALTA's, I'd error on the side of showing or noting anything that you have even the slightest concern over. These are all about putting peop...

9 years ago
Page 13 / 23