AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Meh
Meh
@meh
Member
Joined: March 6, 2020 9:53 pm
Last seen: May 1, 2025 5:16 pm
Topics: 2 / Replies: 147
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

@bundy really? What processor are you using? Maybe I should get acquainted with Teqc and run the data through its QC routines.?ÿ

6 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

@rover83 the plot thickens. I downloaded CORS data for Julian day 183, and downloaded igs and igl files for week 2112, days 2-4 (Julian day 182-184) i...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

@rover83 Iƒ??ll sample same data thatƒ??s a month older and report back.

6 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

@paul-in-pa the more I'm thinking about it, the more I'm inclined to agree with you. As I've stated before this only happens to me dealing with long ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

@loyal completely agree with not all CORS being equal in terms of what they can see in the sky. In this particular case I know that both stations are ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

@rover83 I also attempted to process with the ephemeris type set to automatic, and the result remains the same. As an experiment I'll try downloading ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: TBC baseline processor using GPS only rather than GPS+GLO

I tried processing with GPS and GLONASS broadcast ephemeris files that came with the CORS download, but the result was the same.?ÿ The CODE MGEX ephe...

6 years ago
Topic
Reply
RE: Desperately Seeking Books

I know I'm late to the party, but I thought I'd contribute with this: it appears you can just order from the publisher (Wattles Publications) directly...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: MEO or LEO - Whats the big deal? UK Invests in OneWeb for SBAS

@jim-frame It's hard to tell- Japan's QZSS (4 operating satellites, with 7 total planned) cost ~$1.21B according to Wikipedia. EDIT: It's an apples/o...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@spmpls Fair. I also noticed that when running SECTOR for CRCN I only ran filtered/SOPAC instead of filtered/combination as is recommended for west co...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@mike-marks No argument is being made in favor of coordinates over monuments- this is more of an exercise regarding building a GNSS network in relativ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@spmpls I was thinking more along the lines of when clients require data within xyz epoch (1991.35, 2010, etc.), but your point blew a hole right in t...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@spmpls Am I looking at this right? 1 sigma value for height is 0.215477 meters..? That's uh.. a little different than the published 2017.50 2sigma va...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@spmpls Is it me or does HTDP have an advantage over SECTOR when you account for HTDP being able to transform any given location, while SECTOR is limi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@spmpls That will do it- really appreciate the help. On a somewhat related note: have you noticed that attempting to download rinex from the SOPAC da...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: HTDP in California (read as: Earthquake Land)

@spmpls Great point- I was actually playing with SECTOR earlier today. For conversation's sake it appears that P056, P566, and P571 are potential proj...

6 years ago
Topic
Replies: 17
Views: 1178
Page 7 / 8