Or do we argue over what is original or not?Remember the bogus theory does ignore any previous evidence to the section subdivision lines.

Is there any difference in the rationale of a landowner in the SE1/4SE1/4 and finds out that the north 1/4 is two chains to the east of where it was s...

See Dykes vs Arnold, Oregon.:-)

I am here to tell you that it is going to get messy and highly embarrassing if I can't get an answer!Anybody listening in BLM?Think I am worried about...

Update!Well no answer yet from the Director on the official policy of subdividing sections. I am still confident that I will receive an answer, but i...

At one time, a few years ago, I thought it was a real deal to be the instrument man and wear a plumb bob on the belt.It was a big deal!Keith

:good:

😉

If it floats a rubber ducky, it's wetlands!(not too far from the truth)

amazing!!

Dave,No problem and we all know that some are accepted and some are rejected.

Boy do you have a lot to learn!

MightyMoeMightyMoe,Either come on here with your real name or we are done!Understand?Keith

Dave,The BLM stated in no uncertain terms that their survey was intended to control the mineral estate only and it was not intended to hold sway on su...

MightyMoeIf you want to give some examples of what you post on BLM standards of acceptance, do so, but don't generalize to the point of making stateme...

RankinThis discussion has been about the fact that some believe the sub-surface and surface boundary lines are different and I have reaffirmed from th...

MightyMoeSo what is your problem?

MightyMoeI have just talked with John Lee, Chief Land Surveyor, BLM in Wyoming and has assured me that they believe the sub-surface lines are identica...

judAgain, a great post,However, Courts and Lawyers have no authority to be on the ground to determine boundaries. That is an exclusive right of land ...

MightyMoeI would advise though, that you write a letter to BLM in Wyoming and ask them for an opinion on what you have been posting.They should be abl...