It's not up to the GISers, it's up to the surveyors.The GISers only track the name and the fact of ownership and the tax stuff, and their map is a pre...

Kent> > Definitely the original footsteps of the surveyor, highly defensible from original evidence,Well there you go - if you are finding kinks...

KentSeems pretty clear to me...If none depart from it by more than the uncertainty of the reconstruction, you may simply not have a basis for saying t...

What does obvious careful resurvey or retracement meanYou're NOT repeating what the Manual says. You are saying gaps and kinks are fine. The manual ...

Keith, look at the language in the ManualKeith, I think you are the one babbling here.Have you provided any reference saying that the surveyor has lic...

JackHow about pretty much ANY surveying text talking about "RETRACEMENT"?If the survey is moving the line, then they ain't retracing it. Either the c...

I don't recall Kent articulating any rule of "NEVER" accepting junior monuments.Again, careful with the use of "always" and "never".

The dawn!If the prior senior monuments are still there, and there's a junior monument that's off the line, then it's just one of two things - if it's ...

One reason to miss Bill Strange.And what of Prof. Cliff Mugnier? Anyone hear from him lately? I believe he's still active with ASPRS stuff...