AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Dan-Dunn
Dan-Dunn
@dan-dunn
Member
Joined: November 19, 2010 2:18 pm
Last seen: June 2, 2026 10:50 am
Topics: 6 / Replies: 360
Reply
RE: Merger Doctrine

I don't know what State you are in, but if it's New Jersey read: Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Township of Wall 184 NJ 562 (2005) this cas...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: How Can 30.00 Feet Turn Into 30.01 Feet?

LookingForAnswers, post: 372359, member: 11710 wrote: 2. For some reason, the original plat map shows 655.71' as the distance of the east side of the ...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: New England stone walls along roads

New Jersey has Colonial Legislative Acts starting in 1673 dealing with the layout of roads and highways including the statutory width of the right of ...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: which one of us isn't reading this right?

Rich., post: 359548, member: 10450 wrote: Yes maybe I missed something but TAX LOT 10 I never knew came from the old tract line depicted on the plat. ...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: which one of us isn't reading this right?

Brian Allen, post: 359545, member: 1333 wrote: There is no gap or sliver of land between lot 10 and second street - unless there is pretty darn good e...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: which one of us isn't reading this right?

Rich., post: 359526, member: 10450 wrote: His deed does say it is bounded by the easterly side of the road, so wouldn't that override the distance ca...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: which one of us isn't reading this right?

Dan Patterson, post: 359492, member: 1179 wrote: What about the 64.77 on the tax map where it was once 39.77? I don't think I mentioned that deed cal...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: which one of us isn't reading this right?

Lafayette Boulevard was intended to be set 100' northwesterly of the tract line labeled S 65å¡51'W. So unless there is any older evidence along the t...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: What do you do with this?

clearcut, post: 356544, member: 297 wrote: Common ownership does not merge lots where this case took place. In New Jersey The lots may or may not ha...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: What do you do with this?

The Location of the historical line is irrelevant. The lots were in common ownership in 1989, while it may be 2 lots for taxing and zoning purposes i...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Carlson in the office and Survey Pro in the field

JOHN MACOLINI, post: 354917, member: 7340 wrote: Can you tell me where this command is? I have Survey Pro 5.2.1, and I don't see it. We do this a lo...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Carlson in the office and Survey Pro in the field

I do not use foresight. I download the DXF to the data collector and import it using the Maps - Manage Basemaps - Add - select AutoCAD DXF Files Hope ...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Carlson in the office and Survey Pro in the field

I use Carlson Survey with IntelliCAD 2015 with Survey Pro 4.8.1 I export the points from Carlson as a CR5 file and the line work as a DXF. I import th...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Mylar

New Jersey's requirements: [INDENT=1]46:26A-5 d. To be accepted for recording, a map shall be clearly and legibly drawn in black ink on translucent tr...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Mylar

Sabre970, post: 353733, member: 7481 wrote: Soooo, I know what mylar is, but what exactly is the purpose behind it (I'm a youngin)? Overlays? I never ...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: 2006 ALTA Standards

Deed Staker, post: 350459, member: 9807 wrote: Happy Holidays folks! I'm doing an ALTA for a big league client. The title commitment I just received i...

10 years ago
Reply
RE: Who's right?

My recommended solution to the problem, if your client wants to avoid the expense of court, is for your client to give a 5.98' easement to the adjoino...

10 years ago
Page 7 / 19