AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
clearcut
clearcut
@clearcut
Member
Joined: July 5, 2010 10:27 pm
Topics: 53 / Replies: 884
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

Rivers v Lozeau> Lucas was not correct in his statement about BLM conducting the "resurvey within the section throwing out the local survey" as tha...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

Rivers v. LozeauSeems to be a lot of confusion as to the facts of the case. For instance Mr. Lucas wrote:Traversing the Law: Requiem for the First Su...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

> You all may recall another thread here that I was requesting the surveyor Corky Rodine and the approving official Lane Bouman to explain the circ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

> Keith seems to indicate above that the north line of the 40 was not monumented by BLM on the dependent resurvey which would make that part of the...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

Dave, I value your opinions and appreciate much of your postings.However, when you say a dependant resurvey "moves" a line, I find fault with that. A ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

> Not exactly.> > .... The disputed line was already established. After that the BLM moved the aliquot line. You are correct, the aliquot ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

Rivers v LozeauI read it fine the first time. I am only providing an exact quote from the case as you requested, which is the law at this point in ti...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

Rivers v Lozeau> I assume that you are referring the subject court case, therefore you need to cite some quotes that disputes my concept of a bogus...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

> .... Then the BLM moved the aliquot line ....Being as the BLM survey was a dependant resurvey, I trust you have conclusive proof their work was ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

if it was a snake it would bite you

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Rivers v. Lozeau explained by Don Wilson

Ahem..Not a theory in Florida at least. Actually a fact. Fact of law.Perhaps you should now call it a bogus fact?How confusing is that? Can there actu...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: RFQ vs QBS processes by government agencies

It would be interesting to see the Board tackle an agency for not following QBS. Regardless, from what I know of Jim, they likely not only received th...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: What would you do?

Ding Ding Ding, we have the correct answer...> So to save time and money they don't bother to monument the boundaries of the taking (no called for ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: RFQ vs QBS processes by government agencies

> > California Government Code requires QBS for all A&E contracts (includes surveying).> > > > HOWEVER... Ca Code includes this ...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Today's pics- D'Aste Townsite

Northern Yolo CountyRFQ: request for qualifications or request for quotes. Big difference.

13 years ago
Reply
RE: RFQ vs QBS processes by government agencies

California Government Code requires QBS for all A&E contracts (includes surveying).HOWEVER... Ca Code includes this little diddy:4529. This chapt...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Today's pics- D'Aste Townsite

Northern Yolo CountyJim,Sounds like the project I saw advertised some time back. I thought about submitting a rfq on that it, but decided it was a bit...

13 years ago
Reply
RE: Strange but true...

Would you believe those words actually came from a Mr. Williams?Actually, I'm just having some fun. Keith seems so ardent the need to recognize establ...

13 years ago
Topic
Replies: 5
Views: 319
Page 26 / 47