Forum format: Which do you prefer -- threaded or simplified?
Quote from Wendell on October 2, 2021, 8:24 pm@brad-ott?ÿ
Yeah, if you watch the Non-Surveying category forums (General Chit-Chat, Sports, etc.), they are already setup in simplified format, so you can experience it in real-time.
Yeah, if you watch the Non-Surveying category forums (General Chit-Chat, Sports, etc.), they are already setup in simplified format, so you can experience it in real-time.
Quote from bobwesterman on October 2, 2021, 11:17 pm@wendell?ÿ
- Actually my profile had the correct time zone, but then I went into settings and found another place to set my time zone.
- Actually my profile had the correct time zone, but then I went into settings and found another place to set my time zone.
Quote from bobwesterman on October 2, 2021, 11:24 pmStill seeing UTC.?ÿ After changing timezone and clearing cache.?ÿ It doesn't really bother me and I don't feel like searching right now.
Still seeing UTC. After changing timezone and clearing cache. It doesn't really bother me and I don't feel like searching right now.
Quote from Wendell on October 3, 2021, 1:31 am@holy-cow?ÿ
Yeah, threaded is a neat way of displaying the threads, but can be cumbersome when returning to longer threads later on.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't. There's definitely pros and cons either way.
Yeah, threaded is a neat way of displaying the threads, but can be cumbersome when returning to longer threads later on.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't. There's definitely pros and cons either way.
Quote from hi-staker on October 3, 2021, 2:05 amI accidentally clicked threaded for my vote, when I meant to click simplified.?ÿ
I prefer simplified.
I accidentally clicked threaded for my vote, when I meant to click simplified.
I prefer simplified.
Quote from gene-kooper on October 3, 2021, 2:52 amIt took me some time to get familiar with this format so I prefer it to stay as it is. I won't speculate on the reasons why threads often bifurcate or trifurcate, but the threaded format allows for all of those sub-discussions to stay connected. Yes, I know that one can always use the quote function to make sure everyone knows what the reply is in reference to, but why clutter up a thread with multiple quotes of the same post. I'm not particularly interested in reading the old post ad nauseam.
Thanks for asking, but this is your forum so please don't listen too long at this bunch of old gray-hairs.
It took me some time to get familiar with this format so I prefer it to stay as it is. I won't speculate on the reasons why threads often bifurcate or trifurcate, but the threaded format allows for all of those sub-discussions to stay connected. Yes, I know that one can always use the quote function to make sure everyone knows what the reply is in reference to, but why clutter up a thread with multiple quotes of the same post. I'm not particularly interested in reading the old post ad nauseam.
Thanks for asking, but this is your forum so please don't listen too long at this bunch of old gray-hairs.
Quote from gene-kooper on October 3, 2021, 3:25 amWendell, It sounds to me that those who want to go back to the old style are mainly saying that because of the difficulty in finding the "new" posts in a thread. Can you increase the number of new replies from two to a larger number?
Wendell, It sounds to me that those who want to go back to the old style are mainly saying that because of the difficulty in finding the "new" posts in a thread. Can you increase the number of new replies from two to a larger number?
Quote from Wendell on October 3, 2021, 3:33 am@gene-kooper?ÿ
I can. However, I went with two when I set this all up after extensive testing. Each line that appears under each topic creates a few more database calls. So the more lines that you add, you have exponentially more database calls. This not only slows the site down, but puts more pressure on the system hardware.
Even if I did add more, any replies older than four (or whatever number is chosen) would essentially be lost unless people went digging for them like they do now.
That said, I'm not trying to talk you or anyone else out of the threaded format. I actually like the threaded format a lot, but I do recognize the difficulty in keeping up with unread posts, especially as threads get longer. The simplified format has its cons as well, as the "simplified" name implies. There's definitely a lot more detail in various places with the threaded format.
I can. However, I went with two when I set this all up after extensive testing. Each line that appears under each topic creates a few more database calls. So the more lines that you add, you have exponentially more database calls. This not only slows the site down, but puts more pressure on the system hardware.
Even if I did add more, any replies older than four (or whatever number is chosen) would essentially be lost unless people went digging for them like they do now.
That said, I'm not trying to talk you or anyone else out of the threaded format. I actually like the threaded format a lot, but I do recognize the difficulty in keeping up with unread posts, especially as threads get longer. The simplified format has its cons as well, as the "simplified" name implies. There's definitely a lot more detail in various places with the threaded format.
Quote from party-chef on October 3, 2021, 11:33 amSimplified is better, the threaded thing is only good when things are really popping like chatroom style but that does not happen anymore.
Kent was big on threaded, but has forsaken us and so we can forget his preference.
Simplified is better, the threaded thing is only good when things are really popping like chatroom style but that does not happen anymore.
Kent was big on threaded, but has forsaken us and so we can forget his preference.