AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Today's Rock Mound from 1875

22 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
856 Views
clearcut
(@clearcut)
Posts: 937
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I've come across an 1890's surveyor recently that called for a MOS, but the actual corner points were x's marked on stones set alongside the MOS.


 
Posted : October 30, 2014 11:10 pm
Kent McMillan
(@kent-mcmillan)
Posts: 11416
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> I've come across an 1890's surveyor recently that called for a MOS, but the actual corner points were x's marked on stones set alongside the MOS.

That belongs to the era when railroads had arrived, I'd suspect. In 1875, there were no railroads anywhere in the county where my project is located and so no railroad spikes to scavenge as chisels.

I'm pretty sure that the only marks I've seen cut on natural stone outcrops date from the period of transit and tape surveys, some of them "correcting" original surveys by cutting a mark on supposed true line and ignoring the mound beside it. When you're running across rough terrain with a surveying compass (or so-called "plain transit", which was basically just a 6-inch compass fitted with a telescope), and local landowners as chain carriers, I think you're probably satisfied with 1-vara diameter rock mounds.


 
Posted : October 30, 2014 11:33 pm
Page 2 / 2