AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Odd bearing description in an old deed

25 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
1,640 Views
Kent McMillan
(@kent-mcmillan)
Posts: 11416
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

> If I came across your deed around here I would have no question about the bearings being in degrees and minutes, not seconds. I would figure they were using a staff compass reading to the nearest 1/4 degree, and the 53°23' bearing was an average of readings forward and back on the same line, say N 53°30'E looking forward and S 53°15'W looking back after they moved ahead, likewise the 42°52' might have been 42°45' forward and 43°00' back, averaged.

Considering the relatively short lengths of the lines, it does seem more likely that they were intervisible and that bearings could be measured from tree to tree directly, both backward and forward.

I agree that the differences of nominally 0-07-30 from some bearing with an integral multiple of 15 in the minutes fraction, differences rounded in one instance to 0-07-00 and in the next to 0-08-00, are more simply explained as the means of back and forward bearings differing by 0-15-00.


 
Posted : December 28, 2014 3:55 pm
paul-in-pa
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6034
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Old Deed Closes Good Enough In My Book

As far as an 1825 deed goes I can live with the closure I got, 1/843.

I read the deed as follows;
1/ S 83°45' E 58 Poles 7.5 Links
2/ N 53°23' E 34 Poles 16 Links
3/ N 42°52' E 17 Poles 9 Links
4/ S 88° E 20 Poles 2 Links
5/ S 08° E 24 Poles
6/ S 31° E 16 Poles 11.5 Links
7/ N 68° E 30 Poles 6.5 Links
8/ S 84° E 46 Poles 14 Links
9/ N 43° E 90 Poles 8.5 Links
10/ N 42°30' W 38 Poles 7.5 Links
11/ S 77°25' W 105.5 Poles
12/ N 08°30' E 25 Poles 9 Links
13/ N 57°15' E 4 Poles 17 Links
14/ N 09°40' W 66 Poles
15/ S 86°20' W 69 Poles 22.5 Links
16/ S 03° W 47 Poles 2.5 Links (I used 3° not 3', probably somewhere in between)
2°03' gives very good angular closure. If data is missing make an assumption and prove it right or wrong.
17/ S 62° W 20 Poles 15 Links
18/ S 24° W 107 Poles 10 Links

Area 148.65 acres = 148 acres 2 roods 24 perches

Closure error N 68° E 16.1' or 1 Pole

Plot it and go to the field or overlay an orthophoto.

Paul in PA


 
Posted : December 28, 2014 9:11 pm
m & h taylor
(@m-h-taylor-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 259
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Old Deed Closes Good Enough In My Book

Thanks, Paul. I think, though, that in the sixth course, your number of links should be 4 1/2; compare the 14 in the 8th course. I'm pretty sure that the 16th course uses 3°. But proof is not within my reach here.

Cheers,
Henry


 
Posted : December 28, 2014 10:34 pm
anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Old Deed Closes Good Enough In My Book

I'd agree with Paul
I haven't run a close, but the difference between seconds versus minutes should (I imagine) show an interesting comparison.
My initial thoughts were that given the year of scribing this I would doubt it would show seconds as a unit of angle/ bearing.
I'd suggest a lack of understanding of angular units on behalf of the author of that deed.
I'd also suggest lines shown with only degrees and seconds seems a bit dubious as one would expect minutes should also be involved in the mix.

I've seen some pretty weird early deeds here and nothing really surprises me when one peruses them. Amuse yes, surprise no.
Thankfully we don't have to contend with deeds anymore, but do very occasionally visit them to check old plans.


 
Posted : December 29, 2014 12:06 am
paul-in-pa
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6034
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Rereading 4 1/2 Links Is It

One has to get very familiar with the hand. Still a 1 Pole error and very findable on the ground.

Paul in PA


 
Posted : December 29, 2014 7:06 am

Page 2 / 2