AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Mind Checking a TGO Newb's work?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
313 Views
plumb-bill
(@plumb-bill)
Posts: 1597
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Here is the Adjustment Report

I know I can get the most current Geoid model, and I intend to, but this is mostly for learning reasons.

This was ran using four Trimble R8's. Two GNSS capable units set up on points 101 and 109 for continuous baselines and two R8 type ones (no Glonass) used as rovers.

The reason that I would like to be checked behind is that this looks much better than I had anticipated (too good to be true). This is from last Tuesday, I downloaded and used the posted Rapid ephemeris from NGS. Points 101 and 109 are from a network ran with eight Locus units on four hour sessions, I held them as fixed. Fixed height antennas.

The "rovers" were set up with 15-20 minute overlapping sessions.

p.s. I just realized you would need a Google account to view the PDF, I guess if you would like I could email it to you if you don't have a Google account.


 
Posted : July 14, 2010 4:49 pm
christ-lambrecht
(@christ-lambrecht)
Posts: 1409
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Or ...
you could cross post on https://rpls.com and upload your report in the files section so one needs no google account.
chr.


 
Posted : July 14, 2010 10:46 pm
SteveKerseyPLS
(@stevekerseypls)
Posts: 29
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

It would be interesting to see the minimally constrained adjustment with more realistic setup errors and scaled GPS errors.


 
Posted : July 15, 2010 8:21 am