AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

GNSS positioning rates

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
503 Views
Georges
(@georges)
Posts: 356
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Hello,

Something I would like to clarify about continous topo survey styles with Trimble GNSS equipment:

A GNSS rover receiver and base station are set to a positioning rate of 20 hz (0.05 second). The base is over a survey marker, the rover mounted on a truck. A centerline of a road is surveyed.

The surveyor sets a survey style to continous topo at an interval of 1 second. Is the data recorded at the 1 second interval the average of the last period of measurements (0-1, 1-2, 2-3, etc.) or the actual position at the very time that the 1 second is reached (1,2,3, etc.)?

Would results differ much if the data was processed in post-processed kinematic mode as opposed to real-time mode (RTK)?

Thank you,

Georges


 
Posted : November 12, 2011 8:25 am
Joe M
(@joe-m)
Posts: 427
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

There shouldn't be any averaging going on using a higher observation rate. In fact, I would recommend that you set your base and rover collection rates to be the same rate (sounds like you would want 1 second), because often manufacturers specify different (worse) accuracy and ppm statistics for collection rates less than once per second. I believe manufacturers are forced to take some time saving shortcuts with their algorithms to make data available this rapidly, which reduces their accuracy.

The biggest difference you will see from post processing will probably be the opportunity to use a different ephemeris than the broadcast one, which would theoretically be better. In reality, I'm not sure you will see much of a difference in short baselines that are typical with RTK type surveys.


 
Posted : November 12, 2011 8:53 am