AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Carlson BRX6+ to OPUS problems

5 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
585 Views
James_Wolfe
(@james_wolfe)
Posts: 3
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I need some advice. I am trying to establish a base by doing a static session and converting my .BIN file to a Rinex3 file then sending it off to opus. Where I am having trouble is after I get it back from OPUS and enter in into my data logger then go check a NGS my horizontal is close (within 6") but my vertical has a fill of 6.62 FT. I am not sure where I am going wrong. I've made sure my base height is right, I converted my Base height from ft to M for Opus, My rover height is correct, I've tried to do another burn to see if I possibly got bad info from OPUS. I can't seem to get my height to line up with the NGS. And yes I have tried to check it on a different NGS and still same problem. Any suggestions? Thanks.


 
Posted : March 9, 2023 5:34 pm
rover83
(@rover83)
Posts: 2342
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

What datum & how good is the published vertical of NGS point(s) you are checking?

Just because something was run through OPUS doesn't mean you're going to match all NGS control stations.

If you post up the OPUS report and the NGS datasheet it would be helpful.


 
Posted : March 10, 2023 8:27 am
James_Wolfe
(@james_wolfe)
Posts: 3
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@rover83 One is off of a railroad that was last discovered in 2017 and the other is in the parking lot of the Missouri Department of Transportation Building in my city.


 
Posted : March 10, 2023 8:29 am
rover83
(@rover83)
Posts: 2342
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@james_wolfe

One is off of a railroad that was last discovered in 2017 and the other is in the parking lot of the Missouri Department of Transportation Building in my city.

 

What are the PIDs?

If you're seeing the exact same discrepancy on two different monuments, and you have two OPUS solutions that are agreeing with each other, then something is likely wrong with either the OPUS input or with the RTK setup.


 
Posted : March 10, 2023 2:39 pm
Jon Payne
(@jon-payne)
Posts: 1633
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

then something is likely wrong with either the OPUS input or with the RTK setup.

Agree.  6.62 feet is suspiciously close to a 2M fixed height pole.


 
Posted : March 10, 2023 3:34 pm