Notifications
Clear all

New Format Mr. Sid

22 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
10 Views
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2246
Famed Member Registered
 

Send me a link to the photo you were processing and I'll run it through mine and see how long it takes.

?ÿ

 
Posted : 13/01/2018 3:55 pm
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2246
Famed Member Registered
 

I just grabbed photo 5825 (150,361 KB) and converted it to a full resolution GeoTiff (7,178,326 KB) in about 5 minutes.?ÿ Maybe there was an issue with the particular map you were working on.

My system is about 3-4 years old with an i7-2600 CPU @3.4GHz, 16GB RAM, 64-bit Win-10, with a Nvida GeForce GTRX 1060 6GB video card (not sure that makes a difference).

I was also streaming music on YouTube and had AutoCAD 2017 and three browser windows open while processing the image.?ÿ ??ÿ ??ÿ

 
Posted : 13/01/2018 4:20 pm
(@rj-schneider)
Posts: 2784
Famed Member Registered
 

It's been over fifteen years, but the old 1M doqq weren't that hard to move around in arcview (reprojecting was another ball of wax).

The woldfile was hackable and the coordinates related to the center of the top left pixel, followed by a value for each pixel size. It was a workable option.

 
Posted : 13/01/2018 5:14 pm
(@skeeter1996)
Posts: 1333
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

It was the first file I ran through so maybe there was some system setup functions going on. I did it on the map option.

?ÿ

I've since ran a view option and it ran right through. The coordinate system was different however. There was a shift from where the 2011 version plotted out, however. There was also a very slight rotation difference also.

 
Posted : 13/01/2018 8:19 pm
(@skeeter1996)
Posts: 1333
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

It's geoinfo.msl.mt.gov.com frame 0815

?ÿ

 
Posted : 13/01/2018 9:12 pm
(@stephen-ward)
Posts: 2246
Famed Member Registered
 
Posted by: Skeeter1996

It's geoinfo.msl.mt.gov.com frame 0815

?ÿ

That one took about 1.5 minutes to do a full resolution export to Geotiff.

 
Posted : 13/01/2018 9:56 pm
(@skeeter1996)
Posts: 1333
Noble Member Registered
Topic starter
 

The program must have been busy setting up. It was the first try.

I tried another one this morning and it processed immediately.

I'm good to go. Thanks for the help!

 
Posted : 14/01/2018 10:04 am
Page 2 / 2
Share: