AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

GIS Law in 'fornia

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
357 Views
DEREK G. GRAHAM OLS OLIP
(@derek-g-graham-ols-olip)
Posts: 2054
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/california-supreme-court-finds-gis-mapping-is-a-public-record-subject-to-public-disclosure/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LawOfTheLand+%28LAW+OF+THE+LAND%29


 
Posted : February 24, 2014 10:05 am
peter-ehlert
(@peter-ehlert)
Posts: 2958
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

"Given the rule in California that a statute limiting public access to information should be construed narrowly, while a statute granting public access should be construed broadly, the Court held that the GIS files contained in the Landbase were not a “computer mapping system” or “software” and thus subject to disclosure. For all of those reasons, the Court reversed the decisions of the courts below, and found in favor of the Sierra Club."

a good decision... (they said the Data is Public Property)


 
Posted : February 24, 2014 10:55 am
Mapman
(@mapman)
Posts: 651
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

This case was actually won July 8th, 2013. It also allowed the County to charge a 'nominal' fee for the data. But I believe that fee has now been waived.


 
Posted : February 24, 2014 4:44 pm