AI Assistant
RE: Sat WiFi, VRS, ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

RE: Sat WiFi, VRS, IG8, 35 watt radio Base Anywhere in a VRS without Cell Signal

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
381 Views
ridge
(@ridge)
Posts: 2701
Member
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

I use a real time network, in Utah a VRS (Trimble).. I does require a subscription. Normal way is to connect to the server via the internet. I use a cell phone tethering WiFi hot spot. When in a cell coverage area all you need is a rover and connection to the server.

I work in areas (mountains or remote land) where there is no or at best spotty cell coverage. So you need a GPS base station. So you need a base point with known coordinate or HERE key, collect static and post process. That works to collect data but not stake out, So there is a time delay or extra trip.

What I'm doing is using a satellite WiFi Hot Spot to connect to the internet. The hot spot I have needs to be stationary to work so using it is limited as you can't get more than 3-400 feet away from it and you loose signal. Corrections don't use a lot of data but satellite data is expensive. So the idea is to use the satellite WiFi to connect to the RTN and collect the coordinate for a temporary GPS base point. Once the coordinate is collected the connection to the RTN is closed (no more use of expensive satellite internet data). Then the receiver is started as a GPS base with the RTN collected coordinate. The base also collects a static file that can be processed as a check on the coordinate. You should check into a known point if one is available.

?ÿ

I'm two days into this and it works really well. GPS base anywhere you need one and when you need it not at a later time. The OPUS solution is a check. Be awhile before I know how good this works, my first impression is maybe tighten things up a few hundredths at most.

The Utah RTN is GPS and GLONASS only and no L5 signals. Once I convert to the GPS base I get all the SV's and extra channels (signals). I appears to me it makes things 3 to 4 hundredths better horizontal. Should tighten up the vertical quite a bit but don't have a feel for that yet.

This is big jump forward for me over the two 4700's I was using a year ago.


 
Posted : April 29, 2018 9:40 pm