How good can really...
 
Notifications
Clear all

How good can really long occupation time observations get?

25 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
 

Loyal, post: 362871, member: 228 wrote: GAMIT (from MIT I believe) is about the same price ($25k).

On the other hand, PAGES_NT (from the NGS), is FREE!

Just say'n...

Loyal

I did not know they sold GAMIT. They provided "no cost" licenses to qualified academic and research institutions. Lots of script writing and modifying. Lots of models.

 
Posted : June 3, 2016 5:24 pm
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
 

Kent McMillan, post: 375360, member: 3 wrote: As inexpensive as 4000ssi receivers have gotten, I'm surprised you haven't upgraded. I've bought several units in perfectly functional condition in the last year for about $300 or less each. A good geodetic-grade L1/L2 antenna isn't much more.

Any problems with firmware and the like?

 
Posted : June 3, 2016 5:26 pm
(@felipe-g-nievinski)
Posts: 42
Registered
 

GeeOddMike, post: 375407, member: 677 wrote: Take a look at the JPL site here: http://sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov/post/series.html

There is a link on this page above the map to "Methods" describing the process.

Time series would be much cleaner for relative positioning over short baselines (few km).
No trend or seasonal variation would be discernible as it's in common w.r.t. base station.
Random noise level might not change much, though.

These JPL or IGS results in general are sort of absolute positioning results.
Internally they might relative positioning over very long baselines,
but after network adjustment the base station choice is minimal.

-FGN.

 
Posted : June 3, 2016 5:44 pm
(@kent-mcmillan)
Posts: 11419
 

GeeOddMike, post: 375411, member: 677 wrote: Any problems with firmware and the like?

No, there is no GPS week problem at all. They still log observations normally which produce RINEX files with the correct dates and which OPUS operates upon just as well as ever.

 
Posted : June 3, 2016 6:04 pm
(@geeoddmike)
Posts: 1556
Registered
 

Felipe G. Nievinski, post: 375417, member: 10769 wrote: Time series would be much cleaner for relative positioning over short baselines (few km).
No trend or seasonal variation would be discernible as it's in common w.r.t. base station.
Random noise level might not change much, though.

These JPL or IGS results in general are sort of absolute positioning results.
Internally they might relative positioning over very long baselines,
but after network adjustment the base station choice is minimal.

-FGN.

Howdy, I responded more to the title of the thread rather than its particulars.

 
Posted : June 3, 2016 7:10 pm
Page 2 / 2