I have a Hiper SR and a Hiper II.
When I connect the Hiper SR to a network base ~2.5 miles away I get a Hrms of ~0.03 and a Vrms of ~0.08. Now if I connect it to a network base ~12.5 miles away I get a Hrms of ~0.04 and a Vrms of ~0.2.
Using the Hiper II I get a Hrms of ~0.03 and a Vrms of of ~ 0.05 for the 2.5 mile base and a Hrms of ~0.04 and a Vrms of ~0.06 for the 12.5 mile base.
So my question is: Why is the Vrms so far off with the Hiper SR compared to the Hiper II over a longer baseline, but the Hrms is the same? Both units are tracking GPS and GLONASS.
?ÿ
Ar? both current firmware? ?ÿ ?ÿDo both operate with a controller using same version of software?
what field controller software ?
Both units have current firmware. I am using the same data collector with both units - FC-5000 with Magnet Field 5.1. It gives me the same result when I use the FC-500.
I compared it with an old Legacy-E+ and it agrees with the results I get with the Hiper II.
