Carlson BRx7
Well, I am happy to say that Carlson BRx7 sent me a nice little email today, with pics of their gear being used in challenging places.
I have a few questions, from the USERS and MAKERS of these kind of Pics.
What method is used to determine accuracy? How do you analyze and extract the good data, from the bad? Working in deep woods, introduces curved lines from the Satellite, to the GPS. These “Curved” lines are bouncing around all over. My experience with this kind of equation is that you can spend more time, and take more and more shots, until you start believing some of the shots. This process is automated by Javad, and that’s quite satisfying.
Can anybody articulate the quality of data in the deep dark woods, and how to determine what is good and what is bad?
I have used the old Legacy E from Topcon.
I have used Javad, and consider them to be one of the pioneers in data analysis, in bad places.
So, can I get feedback?
I know Trimble has been working on this, and so have others.
It is our job to try to keep current with our gear.
Thanks
Nate
Log in to reply.