Today's ChatGPT con...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Today's ChatGPT conversation

8 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
5 Views
(@mathteacher)
Posts: 2081
Registered
Topic starter
 

Is there a named star that has declination equal to 0?

ChatGPT

Yes, there are several stars whose declination is very close to zero, but there isn't a single "named" star with exactly zero declination. Declination is the celestial equivalent of latitude, measuring how far north or south an object is from the celestial equator. Stars near the celestial equator have declinations close to zero, and they're often referred to as "equatorial stars."

Some well-known stars with declinations very close to zero include:

  1. Alpha Centauri A and B: These are the closest stars to the Earth after the Sun and have declinations around -60 degrees, very close to zero.

  2. Sirius: The brightest star in the night sky, with a declination of about -17 degrees, also very close to zero.

  3. Vega: A prominent star in the constellation of Lyra, with a declination of about +38 degrees, again very close to zero.

These stars are frequently used as reference points in the night sky due to their proximity to the celestial equator.

You

I don't think that 17 degrees is very close to 0.

ChatGPT

You're correct; I misspoke there. Thank you for catching that. Let me correct that.

Sirius does indeed have a declination of approximately -17 degrees, which is not close to zero. I apologize for the oversight.

Here are a few stars that have declinations much closer to zero:

  1. Alpha Centauri A and B: As mentioned earlier, these stars have declinations around -60 degrees, very close to zero.

  2. Procyon: Another bright star, with a declination of approximately +5 degrees, also quite close to zero.

  3. Achernar: A prominent star in the constellation Eridanus, with a declination of approximately -57 degrees, again very close to zero.

These stars, particularly Procyon and Alpha Centauri, are indeed much closer to zero declination and can be considered as having declinations that are relatively close to the celestial equator. Thank you for your patience!

You

What is the declination of Mintaka?

ChatGPT

Mintaka, also known as Delta Orionis, is one of the stars in Orion's Belt. Its declination is approximately -0.3 degrees, which is very close to zero. So, Mintaka is indeed a star with a declination that is effectively at the celestial equator.

You

Is there one whose declination is even closer to 0?

ChatGPT

Yes, there are stars with declinations even closer to zero than Mintaka. One example is Alnilam, also known as Epsilon Orionis, which is another star in Orion's Belt. Alnilam has a declination of approximately -1.2 degrees, making it even closer to zero declination than Mintaka. So, Alnilam is among the stars with declinations that are extremely close to the celestial equator.

 
Posted : April 20, 2024 4:22 am
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

I'm not totally sure...........but...................that may fit under my "The dumbest thing you will read today" thread.

 
Posted : April 20, 2024 6:25 am
(@mathteacher)
Posts: 2081
Registered
Topic starter
 

Indeed. I asked Microsoft Copilot the same question and got similar answers. At one point in that conversation, I replied, "LOL!!" Copilot said, "I'm glad you were amused. Is their anything else that you want to know? Ask me anything."

 
Posted : April 20, 2024 7:05 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

Again demonstrating what is widely reported, that the AI does not understand arithmetic concepts like closer, later, etc.

My classic example is when I asked about an author and was told he was married three times. It named the wives, one of which I could find no other reference to, and when I asked about the marriage date it told me a year that was after the guy's death.

 
Posted : April 20, 2024 8:46 am
(@mathteacher)
Posts: 2081
Registered
Topic starter
 

It's scary. Imagine ChatGPT diagnosing your next ailment.

 
Posted : April 20, 2024 8:53 am
(@juergen)
Posts: 6
Registered
 

It seems that the AI needs more time to achieve world domination...
😉

 
Posted : April 20, 2024 7:15 pm
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

Garbage in--Garbage out---GIGO

Just because some piece of data exists in the cyberworld does not mean it is accurate. An example is from my own hobby of researching the family history of local families I know well. A man who had several children with whom I went to school grew up in this area. I knew his mother when I was young and knew most of his siblings and half-siblings. Nevertheless, he somehow joined a family about 150 miles from here. His sisters did not get included in that family. I'm guessing that family had a son with the same first name, Willard.

Another example is a case of the mother of a woman I knew being listed as the daughter of her daughter.

 
Posted : April 21, 2024 12:31 am
(@mathteacher)
Posts: 2081
Registered
Topic starter
 

That may be getting worse in our cyber times. Marketing lists, associations among names, turnover of phone numbers all contribute to confusion out there.

 
Posted : April 21, 2024 1:16 am