From a 10 year acquaintance with the aforesaid, I think this might be something they are involved with........
😉
Nope, can't hang that on any of us.?ÿ No Cash boys up in that part of the woods.
Besides, if a Cash boy had that many drones, he'd probably pawn half of them. 😉
Waiting for pictures............
The area involved is very lowly populated, so it probably has little to do with people.?ÿ I could believe it is tied to future plans for the legalized marijuana industry.?ÿ Out of sight equal out of mind, which is a positive in certain businesses.
It seems as though the folks at NORAD got very secure in the fact they can detect an incoming ICBM at mach 20.?ÿ But "low and slow" bogeys seem to have found holes in the fabric of their coverage.?ÿ Over the last couple of years several "low and slow" drones have penetrated secure MOAs (even one near the White House) making those that care very nervous.?ÿ?ÿSo the "folks that keep us safe at night" have been testing upgrades and advances in our air defense concerning low altitude and relatively slow aerial crafts since about 2012.
Given the sparse human (and wildlife) population of the area I'm of the opinion the drones might not be actually watching targets on the ground but might actually be the targets themselves for testing of some radar and tracking upgrades.
Either that or they're spraying saltpeter in the air to render us all numb-nutted idiots headed for the Soylent Green factory...?ÿ ?ÿ ?ÿ
My first knee jerk reaction was that you and the boys (@Bill93) were going to attack Texas for trying to become a sovereign country.
Oh well, maybe next time something big hits. ?????ÿ
I remember reading an article on North Korea before their current rockets and how they might deliver a nuclear weapon. If they used their old bi-planes moving low and slow, the modern anti-aircraft missiles would have a hard time hitting them and jets would have a hard time engaging them. Wasn't a serious consideration, more of a "What if?"
