Dear Uncle Paden
 
Notifications
Clear all

Dear Uncle Paden

17 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

From a previous post you stated:

ƒ??I thought the Regulants were whom Billy the Kid hung around with in Lincoln County.ƒ?

Cripes Paden, everyone knows that Billy hung out with the Montagueƒ??s and Capuletƒ??s didnƒ??t you ever see the movie ƒ??Billy the Kid and Julietƒ??

Y'all have great 4th! 😎

 
Posted : July 1, 2017 5:32 am
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

It should be:
ƒ??I thought the Regulants were those in Lincoln County with whom Billy the Kid hung around.ƒ?

Even better would be:
"It was my assumption that William Bonney, also known as Billy the Kid, associated with Regulants while visiting Lincoln County.

A superior version would be:

My young schoolmate, Billy, told me of his adventures associating with Regulants in Lincoln County.

 
Posted : July 1, 2017 7:18 am
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

I knowed et rite from the git go you wood chime in with your graymar and spellin correctiveness.
It's obvious you haven't been milked today. 😉

 
Posted : July 1, 2017 7:31 am
(@holy-cow)
Posts: 25292
 

A proper churnin' will start the day out right.

Deep thought: When water is removed intentionally, it is known as dewatering. Why is it that cows do not get demilked?

 
Posted : July 1, 2017 7:38 am
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11088
 

Montagues and Capulets: Europe's version of the Hatfields and McCoys.

 
Posted : July 1, 2017 7:40 am
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

Holy Cow, post: 434750, member: 50 wrote: Deep thought: When water is removed intentionally, it is known as dewatering. Why is it that cows do not get demilked?

Probably the same reason as "near miss".

 
Posted : July 1, 2017 8:34 am
(@monte)
Posts: 857
Registered
 

People think you are a better shot if you say near hit

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 7:47 am
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

You mean like this? To me any holes not in the red are a "near miss". 😉

Attached files

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 9:25 am
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

You mean like this? To me any holes not in the red are a "near miss". 😉

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 9:27 am
(@dave-karoly)
Posts: 12001
 

Near miss is a funny term, it implies you almost missed.

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 9:28 am
(@monte)
Posts: 857
Registered
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 435055, member: 379 wrote: You mean like this? To me any holes not in the red are a "near miss". 😉

Actually, looking at your target, I wonder: A) how large your target is? and B) how far away you shot at it from? Because if the target face is only 6" across, then all those rounds were close enough together to be hits in my way of thinking!

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 11:11 am
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11088
 

Monte, post: 435073, member: 11913 wrote: ... then all those rounds were close enough together to be hits in my way of thinking!

I'm fairly sure a 5.56??45mm NATO and a .223 Remington (Cartridge, 5.56mm Ball, M193) pretty much feel the same when they contact a 'target'...

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 11:23 am
(@monte)
Posts: 857
Registered
 

Kinda my meaning. Ever get to wondering why the army targets are silhouettes, but for some reason gun nuts train with bulls eyes? if it stops the target from coming closer, I'm happier!

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 11:26 am
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

Monte, post: 435073, member: 11913 wrote: Actually, looking at your target, I wonder: A) how large your target is? and B) how far away you shot at it from? Because if the target face is only 6" across, then all those rounds were close enough together to be hits in my way of thinking!

That's not my target it was an example of a near miss. However I can at least hit a target 18"??18" (not necessarily the bull's eye) at 20' with a SR9 and a SR9C. It took about 1000 rounds but I got it down pat now. 😎

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 12:20 pm
(@paden-cash)
Posts: 11088
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 435096, member: 379 wrote: That's not my target it was an example of a near miss. However I can at least hit a target 18"??18" (not necessarily the bull's eye) at 20' with a SR9 and a SR9C. It took about 1000 rounds but I got it down pat now. 😎

I use to head to the indoor range a lot...it's only two blocks away from the house. But it tears up my ears. I much prefer outdoor shooting. And I'm about as good a shot as you are. 😉

I figure if it really comes down to it, quantity will win over quality....I'd rather have an intruder exit my house with 9 holes in him than to find him dead in the hallway with just one hole....

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 12:27 pm
(@flga-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2)
Posts: 7403
Registered
Topic starter
 

paden cash, post: 435097, member: 20 wrote: I figure if it really comes down to it, quantity will win over quality....I'd rather have an intruder exit my house with 9 holes in him than to find him dead in the hallway with just one hole...

I agree. Florida has a "Castle Doctrine" statute which allows you to shoot an intrusive person incoming or outgoing.
BTW both the sr9 and the sr9c can hold 17 rounds. 😉

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 1:55 pm
(@richard-imrie)
Posts: 2207
Registered
 

FL/GA PLS., post: 435114, member: 379 wrote: I agree. Florida has a "Castle Doctrine" statute which allows you to shoot an intrusive person incoming or outgoing.

.

Maybe that's the origin of the mandatory warning phrase: "Don't move, or I'll shoot".

 
Posted : July 3, 2017 3:16 pm