AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Why don't we ask Title Companies to certify to the Surveyor

21 Posts
13 Users
0 Reactions
1,226 Views
roger_LS
(@roger_ls)
Posts: 445
Member
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Ron Lang, post: 417603, member: 6445 wrote: You're correct, standards not regulations. I used the wrong vernacular. And I too would rather do ALTA surveys than construction. But my point was that our liability is not limited to the information the title company provides. Just because the title company missed an easement in the search does not limit our liability if we do not catch/show the easement. Ultimately we are the professionals.

I can see obvious things like a power line running through a site, or if there was an indication of an easement shown on a recorded map but not on a Title report, we could be on the hook for this stuff. I've seen plenty of omissions on Title Reports but am just not seeing the definition of a prudent surveyor extending to include a responsibility to thouroughly search the public record to insure a Title Report is complete and correct and especially when it is specifically stated on the face of an ALTA that the easements shown are based on that certain report. But maybe I'm wrong and am all ears to hear about cases where the surveyor was held responsible for a Title Co.'s failure to list an easement recorded in public records.


 
Posted : March 9, 2017 11:48 pm
Page 2 / 2