"RIGHT OF WAY"

> Well, who are they granting the right-of-way to? If it is to the public, that seems perfectly appropriate to me. If it's to themselves, then that is useless.

Andy,

This is the very point that I have a disagreement with our attorneys on. I believe that R.O.W. is held in trust for the public, but the attorneys feel that it's the City's, so we're dedicating to ourselves according to their opnion. But what do I know? 😉

The "city of X", a municipal corporation, hereby dedicates to the public of the "City of X", a municipal corporation of the State of Y, the following described tract for street right-of-way purposes:

One is an entity and the other is entity accepting on behave of the public.

My 2 cents, Jp