AI Assistant
Forums
Land Surveying & re...
Business, Finance &...
Boundary Dispute Bl...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Boundary Dispute Blog ~ Today's lunch hour rumination

    Summarize Topic
Business, Finance & Legal
Last Post by Mapman 12 years ago
2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
561 Views
RSS
DEREK G. GRAHAM OLS OLIP
 DEREK G. GRAHAM OLS OLIP
(@derek-g-graham-ols-olip)
Posts: 2054
Member
Topic starter
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

http://www.boundarydisputelaw.com/thoughts-theory/thompson-v-schlittenhart-47-wnapp-209-734-p2d-48-1987---exclusive-use/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BoundaryDisputeLawBlog+%28Boundary+Dispute+Law+Blog%29

Cheers,

Derek


 
Posted : July 7, 2014 9:18 am
Mapman
 Mapman
(@mapman)
Posts: 651
Member
Translate ▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Thanks for the post. Interesting to see what the court uses to base a decision on. I felt the first surveyor was the most diligent in his re-tracement. The judge apparently thought so too.

Not sure how estoppel would have come into play here. I did not see where a previous judgement had been made.


 
Posted : July 7, 2014 11:35 am
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic  
Share:
Share
Tweet
Share
Share