http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110718084.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20WACO%2020110718844.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20WACO%2020110718838.xml&docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR
It is notable in Soffey v. Dan that the court noted:
But the trial court did not determine the legal property boundary. Although there was evidence that a survey had been performed during the construction process, no survey was submitted into evidence. The court noted that the survey was, in fact, irrelevant to its findings that the parties agreed to respect a particular line dividing their front yards and that certain paving stones installed by the Dans along this line "protrude by inches" across this line onto the Soffeys' property.
Richard Schaut
> that certain paving stones installed by the Dans along this line "protrude by inches" across this line onto the Soffeys' property
Is that like saying, "Your dirt is on my property"?;-)
