The calls were the correct bearing, but ordered in reverse. Instead of POB, Call 1, 2, 3, 4, Back to POB, the description was written POB, Call 4, 3, ...
I would say yes. I think someone on here mentioned it before, but it might encourage people to intentionally “grow” their fences.I think we would all ...
Not a solution to the perpetual license issue, bet Revu by Bluebeam is more featured and suited to the type of work we do, and is similar in pricing t...
In my area the subdivision plats are very thoroughly checked for mathematical correctness by the county surveyor before recording. And county crews re...
In argument of no particular position, I give this example and how this practice can play out: Image 1 is a portion of a retracement survey of a group...
In this situation, the descriptions of the adjoining parcels are actually out of a plat, albeit one from the 1940s. In my area, it was common in the e...
You don’t. These monuments may be “issues”. Life is like that.But what is the point of my survey if not to reveal "issues"?
You don’t. These monuments may be “issues”. Life is like that.But is it not my responsibility to report findings like this? Not arguing, genuinely wan...
IMO, the retracing surveyor is acknowledging the existence of those off line monuments but calling them garbage.Garbage or not, they are there, and th...
As I understood, he has been represented pro-bono by a free speech non-profit public advocacy foundation.
No requirement in NC. Usually not an issue, but can create some headaches in research. Also raises the question, which perhaps is unique to this juris...
In my experience, NCDOT leaves a mess wherever they go. The descriptions for the their fee simple takings don't ever appear to be actually surveyed, d...
Carlson SurvPC has a GNSS Analysis function I have used. Still somewhat of a "black-box", but it purports to perform a least squares analysis and adju...
