AI Assistant
Activity
 
Notifications
Clear all
Brian Allen
Brian Allen
@brian-allen
Member
Joined: March 8, 2011 3:00 pm
Topics: 25 / Replies: 1545
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

Dave Karoly, post: 414518, member: 94 wrote: I think one of the problems we have is trying to apply logic to legal problems. Oliver Wendell Holmes, J...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

BajaOR, post: 414513, member: 9139 wrote: As R/W markers I say accept them after you're comfortable they fit the pattern of others that are up and dow...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

I'm watching/working on one now where the district court made the judgment (boundary follows occupation line, not the measurements), but the district ...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: DOT boundaries

aliquot, post: 414494, member: 2486 wrote: I never liked the argument that the monuments don't hold because contracters set them inaccurately. DOT is ...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

I'd obtain a copy of the judgment and provide copies to the title company, assessor, etc. If they want to argue with the court, so be it.What a messe...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Interesting boundary issue

WA-ID Surveyor, post: 414118, member: 6294 wrote: Long time lurker but have never really had an opportunity to make a post until now. In 1980 a Judm...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Deed stakers dilemma

Tom Adams, post: 413740, member: 7285 wrote: My point is that you can't make a legal determination of acquiescence. A court might rule differently th...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Deed stakers dilemma

Tom Adams, post: 413713, member: 7285 wrote: If the surveyor sees evidence of an acquiesced-to boundary, is it up to him to make the legal determinati...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: 6 years later

A Harris, post: 413266, member: 81 wrote: [SARCASM]Who does he think he is, an engineer[/SARCASM]I'd have guessed one rung lower .... a bureaucratic ...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary opinion

Hack, post: 413272, member: 708 wrote: If you would take the time to read the entire thread you would realize that nobody was rejecting it "merely bec...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Lucus is letting 50% of us have it in POB this month!

Jim in AZ, post: 413254, member: 249 wrote: I believe his point is that we shouldn't treat Retracement Surveys as if they are Original surveys. If a p...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary opinion

Sergeant Schultz, post: 413250, member: 315 wrote: I am truly astounded at the number of people who like that darned pipe! I could be persuaded, if th...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Lucus is letting 50% of us have it in POB this month!

Duane Frymire, post: 413145, member: 110 wrote: So they're grandfathered out?Maybe........... 😉 Sure hope so.A more relevant question is how many c...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary opinion

First, What is your definition of established? Of course the properties were never in common ownership again or it would have been stated.Black's Law ...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Lucus is letting 50% of us have it in POB this month!

Dave Karoly, post: 413118, member: 94 wrote: I've seen too much havoc caused by Land Surveyors resubdividing sections in the face of decades of settle...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Boundary opinion

A few thoughts: First, I tend to agree with Dave K.; for two properties to be in separate ownership and possession for over 130 years without having...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: Just wondering...

A positive work load would probably still be there and a positive income would therefore remain. However the positive attitude of the surveyor (me) w...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: I Dunno how many of you read the magazine P.O.B.

No matter the cause of the problem/predicament, or even if the current hysteria of the "lack of future surveyors" is true or not, I would think that w...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: So where should the survey monuments go

Tom Adams, post: 408563, member: 7285 wrote: I mean if a deed says "starting here and going 200' east and 200' south.....it's hard to argue with a sur...

9 years ago
Reply
RE: So where should the survey monuments go

Tom Adams, post: 408526, member: 7285 wrote: but, from what I read, the legal description is more than likely without ambiguity. I am assuming it clos...

9 years ago
Page 7 / 79