imaudigger, post: 378777, member: 7286 wrote: Never see it abbreviated that way in my area. RSB1, PG48 is what I am used to seeing. Lake County appar...
What JB said presumes simultaneous creation of all the parcels, such as via a tract map with a r/w easement dedication. If that's not the case, what ...
If the word "certify" scares you, have your representatives in the state capitol do what California did: define "certify". 6735.5. The use of the word...
The first step in rehab is to hang out with the fewest surveyors possible, or in Mrs. BajaOR's terms, hang out with the "least squares".
Jim Frame, post: 377424, member: 10 wrote: I'm kind of new to full-size bipod use. (I've been using a shorty for years, but just for a prop, not for ...
Robert beat me to it...
One won't forget their name once you hear it. It might even appeal to my daughter, who grew up with Clifford books. I hope that by the time she's ol...
Tell him the surveys are all geo-referenced to the same datum, that it's just survey tolerances that are showing up, and the 3 surveys just have to be...
I assume that smaller mapping angles are another benefit of LDP's?
I get it. The common CORE perspective :-).
Someone had to work at making that mistake.
If that were on a construction site or out in the middle of nowhere it'd be less offensive. Either way it'll be faded away before long.
If production is the priority, maybe you don't need to be perfectly plumb, so maybe a gimbal setup is not needed. At a 1.500m prism height you can be...
So it's not guilty until proven innocent as I thought, it's guilty even after being proven innocent. Thanks Evan.
You don't want contours, you want the surface model from which the contours were approximated.
Right. If the location fails any test it becomes something other than a corner by common report. Its new name would often be "contested corner". Or...
I don't know where I got this, but it sounds mostly right, and is consistent with other notes I have on the subject: "For a corner location to be acce...
Robert Hill, post: 372988, member: 378 wrote: That sounds like something a used car salesman would say. It's c-o-w, not c-a-r.