Server Upgrades today (2023-03-08) and tomorrow
Quote from jitterboogie on April 8, 2023, 3:21 am[quote data-userid="1" data-postid="615339"]
Just wanted to apologize yet again for the slowness of the server. Moving to a new server was a good choice, but now we are having trouble with the licensing of the "world-class" caching system and the developers are working on fixing that. This is why the server is still so slow, because NOTHING is currently being cached; literally everything is being reloaded every time you view a page. :-/
[/quote]
whoa.
Posted by: wendellJust wanted to apologize yet again for the slowness of the server. Moving to a new server was a good choice, but now we are having trouble with the licensing of the "world-class" caching system and the developers are working on fixing that. This is why the server is still so slow, because NOTHING is currently being cached; literally everything is being reloaded every time you view a page. :-/
whoa.
Quote from Jon Payne on April 8, 2023, 4:45 pm@bill93 4800 is the farthest back I can recall actually using. The 14.4 was a "high speed" upgrade, costing around an additional $300- $600, when I was finishing college. It seems that within just a few years it jumped through 28.8, 56.6 and then cable.
Early 90s fast - 14.4 kbs
versus
Now (advertised speeds) fast - 1,500,000 kbs
Just looked up an online calculator. Some aerial photos I have downloaded are on average around 100MB.
Back in the 14.4 time period, that file would take about 15 hours to download (if you even tried to download it - of course probably using some form of file downloader that would allow you to pick up on the file after the inevitable dropped dial-up).
Now, I can get it within 10 to 20 seconds at my office. And if I were in an area with the highest speeds available, the time probably wouldn't even register in seconds.
@bill93 4800 is the farthest back I can recall actually using. The 14.4 was a "high speed" upgrade, costing around an additional $300- $600, when I was finishing college. It seems that within just a few years it jumped through 28.8, 56.6 and then cable.
Early 90s fast - 14.4 kbs
versus
Now (advertised speeds) fast - 1,500,000 kbs
Just looked up an online calculator. Some aerial photos I have downloaded are on average around 100MB.
Back in the 14.4 time period, that file would take about 15 hours to download (if you even tried to download it - of course probably using some form of file downloader that would allow you to pick up on the file after the inevitable dropped dial-up).
Now, I can get it within 10 to 20 seconds at my office. And if I were in an area with the highest speeds available, the time probably wouldn't even register in seconds.
Quote from rj-schneider on April 9, 2023, 12:06 am@jon-payne Reminds me that Gordon Moore had recently passed. Not sure how interesting that is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law
@jon-payne Reminds me that Gordon Moore had recently passed. Not sure how interesting that is.