I know I could probably research this and get an answer but with all the brains on this site I figured I could get and answer quicker here. (grin)
The campground where we stayed this weekend had a 1 mile hike from the campsite to the beach.?ÿ With an 85 year old with us that was kinda out of the question.?ÿ We drove to the parking lot for public access to the beach each day.?ÿ The "public" beach was about 80 yards long with signs at each end stating "Private Property, Owners and Guests Only".?ÿ In Florida does private property extend to the "Mean High Tide"??ÿ Being ornery I walked up and down the beach anyway, I just wonder if I did, in fact, break the law.
Andy
I'ts public to the MHW at least on the Atlantic, the Gulf has had all kinds of crazy stuff happen. The rich oceanfront dwellers do not like vermin such as us to despoil their "beach" which it ain't, at least it ain't below MHW. You done good, boy. ?????ÿ
Andy Johnson would know about the Gulf side!
Above mhwl is public or private owner. Below it- is State of FL - Gulf of Mexico (for the most part).?ÿ
I've seen those sorts of issues in Naples and Marco Island.?ÿ Land owners/condos trying to restrict beach goers doesn't really happen in my area (yet).?ÿ
Since private ownership technically goes to the MHWL (in general) and that is very near the active wave area (in my region), I can see people making that argument, but I am not a fan. ?ÿ ?ÿ I believe there is a pretty standard "common use" area of the beach from the last line of vegetation to the water.?ÿ?ÿ
Also, in many areas, the upland rights have been severed from the shore by "beach renourishment" operations.?ÿ These include an "erosion control line" that owners have to agree to in order for the state to fix the shore by pumping in massive amounts of sand from offshore.?ÿ
If you'd share where this was, I'm curious as to what the true legal rights in the area are.
?ÿ
Andy?ÿ
Riparian rights relate to flowing water. Static water bodies are governed by littoral rights...
Riparian rights relate to flowing water. Static water bodies are governed by littoral rights...
Unfortunately the two are interchanged so often in FL they are confused. But you are correct, thanks.?ÿ ?????ÿ
@flga
I was surprised to see 'mean high water' referenced on oceanfront?ÿ property. Given the fact Florida has more coastline relative to land mass than the remainder of the 48 you would expect tides to be mentioned in there...
@andy-j Grayton Beach, just west of Seaside.?ÿ We were staying at Topsail Hill State Park.?ÿ They have a beautiful beach there but without their tram running the walk was out of the question.
?ÿ
About 60% of WA state coastal properties are tidelands properties, where ownership extends out varying distances beyond mean low tide.?ÿ They banned tideland sales after 1971 but lots of grandfathered property in there.?ÿ It does cause problems with neighbors, but a good friend of mine was able to keep his dad home with top notch in home care until the end by leasing his tidelands to a geoduck farming operation.
Hawaii's the opposite.?ÿ They have a "Paddle Rule", making all coastland below mean high tide accessible to the public (legally, not always physically).
@thebionicman think of all the headlines you??ve seen that start ??Florida man?, then consider if you should really hold any expectations of the sunshine state..... 😉
Given what I've seen of the west coast of FL and how shallow a gradient there is, good luck determining MHW. Aside from that I've sure seen a lot of "Private Property' signage on public beaches and accesses placed there by overzealous residents.?ÿ
Be careful with imprecise terms. On much of the cost private property ends not at mean high tide, but a mean higher high tide.?ÿ
Oregon has public beaches in the form of a very powerful easement.?ÿ One of the surveyors behind that early technical work is Professor Schultz at Oregon State University, https://cce.oregonstate.edu/feature/oregon-state-legend-retires-after-56-years-teaching.?ÿ There is a great book about the history of this as well which is available online, https://stateparks.oregon.gov/index.cfm?do=main.loadFile&load=_siteFiles%2Fpublications%2Foregon_s-beaches-birthright-preserved113001.pdf
The vegetation line is in statute with NAD27 State Plane coordinates in ORS 390.770, https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors390.html.?ÿ Of course they stopped letting us surveyors write statute after those 20+ pages of coordinates.?ÿ For saved effort we never updated to NAD83 knowing that NAPGD2022 and NATRF2022 were just around the corner!?ÿ
Florida Chapter 177?ÿ?ÿ Part 2
?ÿ
177.25 Short title.--This part shall be cited as the "Florida Coastal Mapping Act of 1974."
History.--s. 1, ch. 74-56.
177.26 Declaration of policy.--The Legislature recognizes the desirability of confirmation of the mean high-water line, as recognized in the State Constitution and defined in s. 177.27(15) as the boundary between state sovereignty land and uplands subject to private ownership, as well as the necessity for uniform standards and procedures with respect to the establishment of local tidal datums and the determination of the mean high-water and mean low-water lines, and therefore directs that uniform standards and procedures be developed.
History.--s. 2, ch. 74-56; s. 2, ch. 91-56.
?ÿ
@andy-bruner?ÿ I looked at www.labins.org but don't see any Erosion Control Lines up there.
