Notifications
Clear all

5' off

23 Posts
10 Users
0 Reactions
5 Views
(@john-putnam)
Posts: 2150
Noble Member Customer
 

I'm sure you've looked, but could it be a US Ft vs Int Ft thing?

 
Posted : 11/07/2024 2:57 am
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 9920
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Good question, but we aren't even at the XY stage, strictly trying to get the Lat, Longs to mesh.

 
Posted : 11/07/2024 5:22 am
(@dmyhill)
Posts: 3082
Famed Member Registered
 

The usual solution is to run a site configuration against your control points

Either you check in and configure (localize), or you have nothing

 
Posted : 11/07/2024 5:25 am
(@timd1971)
Posts: 225
Reputable Member Registered
 

"Basically, they don’t understand the equipment and I don’t have hands on access to it."

There's your problem! 🙃

 
Posted : 11/07/2024 6:07 am
(@olemanriver)
Posts: 2432
Famed Member Registered
 

I saw something similar once. I was testing a rental unit. R12i tsc7. It was off several feet using rtx vs what I knew was about the right nad83(2011) value I had from VRs and an opus solution. I didn’t dive to much into it but the rental dc I swapped same r12i and it was no longer off but a tenth or so on the ground. I chalked it up to a software glitch in that version of Trimble access. We had the latest at the time and the rental was a few versions behind. Not saying that’s it but coordinate system managers often need updates.

 
Posted : 11/07/2024 7:30 am
(@olemanriver)
Posts: 2432
Famed Member Registered
 

I did a quick check in the help menu online for Trimble access. Two things caught my eye. One is that it seems you can apply a rtx rtk offset between frames of itrf and rtk data so that might be a setting causing the issue. The other I saw was rtx is in a ITRF 2005 epoch only. Now I didn’t read all of everything just thought if you had a chance to read up on that or the users it might shed some light on the issue.

 
Posted : 11/07/2024 8:05 am
(@mightymoe)
Posts: 9920
Illustrious Member Registered
Topic starter
 

Got it, the surveyor for my client (PE) stopped by the office with his DC and R12i. We were able to set-up in his controller a state plane RTX job with a ITRF to NAD83 setting. We can also do a local site scale factor so there are ground coordinates on their system. We did a second set up for our office control points and checked it RTX and it was the expected .2' from the NAD83(93) position.

Easy peasey, I only needed to get my hands on his stuff. He is going out this afternoon and test out the set-up,,,,,,,,,,no need for a calibration.

 
Posted : 16/07/2024 4:45 am
(@robertusa)
Posts: 371
Reputable Member Registered
 

Why did you setup control points for someone who was not going to use it, just check into it, while using different control (base station data)? 🤔

 
Posted : 21/07/2024 9:50 am
Page 2 / 2
Share: