Activity Feed › Discussion Forums › Strictly Surveying › Virtual Pin Cushions
-
Tom Adams, post: 394381, member: 7285 wrote: No nerves hit here. Don’t interpret disagreeing with your stance as being angry. I think the discourse has been quite civil.
I’m saying that because the terms “give” and “take” don’t seem to sit well with surveyors. I don’t think of boundary resolution this way and I would never describe things this way to a client. The boundary is where it is. But clients and more importantly adjoiners can and do view things from this perspective and especially when they are buying very expensive real estate, and there can be a limit as to how much educating we can do. How much land is enough to sue a neighbor that you hate over? Should the answer to this question have anything to do with how we look at final boundary resolution? In my opinion, as property values continue to rise, these conflicts between neighbors will only increase.
-
I’m bumping this because this post was just on a slide in an online live presentation for Illinois ethics.
I’ve hit the big time and can now retire.
-
I have heard being famous is far better than being infamous.
I will probably never know for sure.
-
Isn’t infamous when you’re more than famous?
“…people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.” -Neil Postman -
Accepting a monument as representing someone else’s opinion of the corner does not require you to change the relevant deed description. All measurements contain errors, yours and mine. Endless endeavors to create perfection are just that, endless.
Paul in PA
-
@bear-bait No. This was a one way presentation with very little audience input, but the instructor was not in favor of it.
-
This has to be the longest (running) thread.
-All thoughts my own, except my typos and when I am wrong.
Log in to reply.