Beluga or Sevruga
>All I'm saying is that whether or not there's a p&r category here is up to the administrator of the site.
Sure, this is Wendell's party, but like any good host, I think he'd probably like some feedback on certain questions that are essentially matters of taste. He's not going to serve Beluga caviar, for example, if everyone prefers Sevruga.
Beluga or Sevruga
> Sure, this is Wendell's party, but like any good host, I think he'd probably like some feedback on certain questions that are essentially matters of taste. He's not going to serve Beluga caviar, for example, if everyone prefers Sevruga.
LOL! Okay, I've never been to a cookout where the host asked me beforehand if I'd prefer Angus beef burgers to venison road kill. So, I concede that your point is beeger than mine here.
Take care,
Ed
Kent ...Then if humour has a sexual connotation.....
What are your rules if it is acceptable...
BTW humour was around way before politics and therefore the initial post is categorised correctly as humour.
RADU
Babylon
> BTW humour was around way before politics and therefore the initial post is categorised correctly as humour.
If that's true, you should be able to tell a joke that is older than Babylon. :> The record otherwise suggests that politics is older than jokes. You may not be tuned into all the nuances of US politics at the moment (and probably a majority of Americans aren't either, so you've got company) but the "joke" at the beginning of the tread is basically [Teapartier] rhetoric.
