BCS, Auburn # 1, Or...
 
Notifications
Clear all

BCS, Auburn # 1, Oregon # 2

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@paul-in-pa)
Posts: 6044
Registered
Topic starter
 

And the popularity polls seems to be giving Boise State more credit than is due.

2010 NCAA BCS Football Rankings - Week 9 (Oct. 24)
RK TEAM RECORD
1 Auburn 8-0
2 Oregon 7-0
3 Boise State 6-0
4 TCU 8-0
5 Michigan State 8-0
6 Missouri 7-0
7 Alabama 7-1
8 Utah 7-0
9 Oklahoma 6-1
10 Wisconsin 7-1
11 Ohio State 7-1
12 LSU 7-1
13 Stanford 6-1
14 Nebraska 6-1
15 Arizona 6-1
16 Florida State 6-1
17 Oklahoma State 6-1
18 Iowa 5-2
19 Arkansas 5-2
20 South Carolina 5-2
21 Mississippi State 6-2
22 Miami (FL) 5-2
23 Virginia Tech 6-2
24 Nevada 6-1
25 Baylor 6-2

Auburn could actually hold on to # 1 for a few weeks. Their schedule is Mississippi, Chattanooga, Georgia then Alabama. They could drop in the computers after beating Chattanooga, a Football Championship not BCS school. The Alabam game may be the actual National Championship game before the SEC Championship even.

Being # 2 takes some luster out of the Oregon-USC game next weekend.

Paul in PA

 
Posted : October 24, 2010 4:45 pm
(@darrell-andrews)
Posts: 425
Registered
 

I like the SEC, but I don't see Auburn being #1 in the BCS. I mean they were 4th and leap-frogged Oregon - who hardcore OWNED UCLA. From a non-statistical perspective, Oregon looked like the best team in the nation against UCLA. Auburn was OK. I firmly believe in a classical playoff system, and think the BCS should be used for seeding purposes in said playoff system, where the bowls are certain levels of the brackets. But I will probably be too old to care by the time they implement the idea.

 
Posted : October 24, 2010 5:13 pm