Notifications
Clear all

Skidmore v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co, No. 19-2482 (4th Cir. 2021)

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@makerofmaps)
Posts: 548
Prominent Member Registered
Topic starter
 

This one is great. We have railroads, a house in the right-of-way, drainage problems, mentions of adverse possession and more.......

?ÿ

 
Posted : 16/06/2021 7:44 am
(@bill93)
Posts: 9834
 

She should have dumped a load of rock on the eroding creek bank and never got into a conflict with the RR.

I don't see any discussion of whether the RR obtained the land in fee or as an easement. They are calling it a right of way which should imply an easement, but treating it as fee ownership.?ÿ Or that if it's a RR then the distinction doesn't matter?

 
Posted : 16/06/2021 8:05 am
(@dmyhill)
Posts: 3082
Famed Member Registered
 

@bill93?ÿ

Don't pull (or start) on that thread. We will get into the wholesale theft of land into bike trails...and then we are only a short step into the abyss.?ÿ

 
Posted : 16/06/2021 9:17 am
Share: