Every state probably has mandatory recording of new large subdivisions. There have been a lot of comments over the years here about states thet do not require or even encourage recording surveys of individual tracts.
Mandatory recording of all boundary surveys, not just plats. Geez, was it really that difficult to grasp what I was getting at?
You survey an existing tract and find all monuments in place and matching record and you have to record that survey?
You survey an existing tract and find all monuments in place and matching record and you have to record that survey?
Yes, that should be required.
Next question.
Mandatory recording.
I'm licensed in 2 recording states, Oregon & Washington. In Clark County, WA you email a pdf of your survey to the County Surveyor. He reviews and returns it by close of business the same day. Naturally, such a review is not overly detailed. Filing fee is a bit under $300.
In Oregon, you submit a paper copy of your survey, full size by US Mail, and they will review it within 6 weeks. They have staff that does nothing but review surveys. They go over it with microscopes, redline your paper, and return it by US Mail. Some things are required fixes and some are just suggestions, but you can't really tell which is which. You then have a month to respond. A few cycles of this is common. In 6 months or so, you will get your survey filed. Filing fee $455.
You will not find any math errors on an Oregon Survey. You might on a Washington one. But I prefer the Washington process.
I'm licensed in 2 recording states, Oregon & Washington. In Clark County, WA you email a pdf of your survey to the County Surveyor. He reviews and returns it by close of business the same day. Naturally, such a review is not overly detailed. Filing fee is a bit under $300.
You send it to the County Surveyor? Why not just send it to the Auditor (no review is contemplated in the RCW other than for form)? Does the County Surveyor charge for review?
If it is done as a courtesy, who wouldn't appreciate another set of eyes, but the biggest counties in WA have no review by a surveyor on any survey documents. This might include plats. The plats will get checked against the closure report and for completeness, but review isn't typically done by a surveyor, as far as I know, and if the Plat is in a city, the county has zero review, other than for form (no blue ink!!!).
You send it to the County Surveyor? Why not just send it to the Auditor
It's the process in Clark County. I'm not sure if I could force things and have no desire to find out. No, there is no additional fee.
Many years ago I worked in Whatcom County. One of my assigned tasks was delivering completed surveys to the auditor's counter. So I'm familiar with the drill.
A few cycles of this is common.
Always gotta love the perpetual review process.
Not required in all states. I've drawn up many boundary plans, ready to be recorded, that never saw the light of day again.
I believe that some states don't even require recording of plans showing single lot divisions
I am probably one of the few here who wished this disclaimer could be true.
While boundary lines for the most part, don't move after a real estate transaction, I feel that the use of a plan/plat/document that was prepared by a surveyor for a specific client, shouldn't be able to be used from owner to owner, in perpetuity. And if used by someone other than the original owner/client, the surveyor shouldn't be held liable.
It's currently like an insurance policy with a single premium, paid by the original client.
I'm sure it'll never change, but it's my dream
If all they do is glance at the survey for $300-500 then I'll take a pass on that 'service'. If they go around and maintain all of the public land corners in their county as well then maybe it's a different story. I like Idaho's way actually, no review and $5 to record a (non-plat) survey. Let the professionals be responsible for their work.
Ken Paul is the Clark County Surveyor; he was deputized as an Auditor, so he he can record survey related documents. His office is where you go, to record surveys and research survey records. The Auditor's office has deeds and all the other recorded documents. I've never recorded a survey in Clark County, this is what I heard. I know Ken, personally.
I believe this is the only county in Washington that does this. I applaud them.
The Recording fee for surveys, in Washington State, recently went up; it's $323.50 plus $5.00 for each additional page. But I see, on the Clark County Website, the recording fee is $292.50.
This is, more or less, how they did it in Nebraska. The County Surveyor was an elected position and was paid a salary. Research was easy and fun; you talked to someone that knew what you were talking about.
I was shocked, when I moved to Washington. No wonder it takes so long to do a simple, residential, boundary survey, in a platted subdivision.
