-
50 + 40 = 90
Working on a little mystery and local cluster chaos, normal for the area.
Got some conflicting descriptions that been in the record for many decades. Owners been doing their own thing with fences etc. based on the recorders plot of the descriptions. Description says West then goes N 50 W. Keeps on going then a big misclosure. Fence goes more like N 40 W. So after messing here and there for several sessions I decide to plot the deed at N 40 W. It clears up a lot, removes most of the misclosure and explains most of the problem, at least for me. I can’t do the same thing to the adjoining deed as its final course hits a stream and then just goes along the stream to the POB.
The N 50 W vs the N 40 W causes a difference in the east/west location of the end of the line. So it appears that the one landowner owns into the front yard of the other landowner across the street. These neighbors have had other boundary issues down through the years. So I need to convince them that my sixth sense here to solve the issue and get them to agree to relocate the boundary by agreement. They don’t teach this stuff in survey school!
Anyway, my theory is the surveyor (if there was one) turned a 50 degree angle from West. Then wrote N 50 W instead of N 40 W for the bearing of the next course (50 + 40 = 90). I can’t prove it other than to show that when you do that most of the chaos go away. The only way I can repair the old record is to have the landowners agree and record an agreement. Will they do it? We shall see.
Log in to reply.